Skip to content
Regulatory Mapping

Stay ready for PIPEDA reviews

Map PIPEDA to the controls and evidence your team already manages, keep the record current between cycles, and answer examiners, auditors, and buyers with traceable proof the moment they ask for it.

Publisher
Government of Canada
Primary version
Act current to 2026-01-19 and last amended on 2025-03-04 (Justice Laws Website).
Coverage
1 jurisdiction
Mapping updated
Mar 16, 2026
Request a 15-Minute Walkthrough Browse Integrations
Why teams start here
Best fit
Programs that need state or regulator-specific proof mapped into the same control and evidence system they already maintain.
What stays visible
  • The exact review version stays in scope.
  • Owners, freshness, and approval state stay visible.
  • Reviewers get structured exports instead of loose files.
Requirements
130
Mapped controls
24
Evidence mappings
81
Automated checks
133
View official source

From request to handoff

How Teams Stay Review-Ready Between Cycles

Aurora turns one named framework request into a repeatable operating motion your team can maintain between audits, buyer reviews, and renewals.

01
Scope the exact version
Start with the PIPEDA version your reviewer or buyer already asked for so the record matches the request in front of you.
02
Reuse the controls you already trust
Map overlapping requirements to the same governed control library instead of rebuilding the program around one framework.
03
Keep proof current between cycles
Attach evidence with owners, freshness expectations, and reminders so the package stays current while the business keeps moving.
04
Capture approvals and decisions
Keep policy approvals, exceptions, and review history linked to the same record so reviewers see the operating context, not just files.
05
Hand off a clean reviewer package
Share structured access or export a scoped package with mappings, evidence context, and timestamps already intact.

Governed proof

The Mapped Record Your Reviewer Opens

Show the exact framework version, the linked controls, and the supporting evidence in one clean view instead of sending reviewers into folders.

Aurora controls workspace showing in-scope framework mappings, linked evidence, and governed context.
Mapped Controls
What this framework covers

Canada federal private-sector privacy law that incorporates the CSA Model Code (Schedule 1) and sets requirements for collecting, using, disclosing, retaining, and safeguarding personal information, including breach notification and access rights.

Requirements
130
Mapped controls
24
Evidence specs
81
Versions supported
1
Governed outputs
  • Requirement-to-control mappings reviewers can trace line by line
  • Evidence records with owners, timestamps, and source context
  • Policy approvals and version history tied to the record
  • Point-in-time snapshots for the exact review window in front of you
Version-specific mappingsEvidence with owner + freshnessExportable reviewer package
See It with Your FrameworkCompare Plans

Versions

Supported Versions

Choose the published version your reviewer, customer, or auditor expects.

Act current to 2026-01-19 and last amended on 2025-03-04 (Justice Laws Website).
View Source
Requirements
130
Mapped controls
24
Evidence mappings
81
Automated checks
133
Coverage request

Need a Framework We Do Not List Yet?

If one customer, auditor, or regulator requirement is the only thing holding up the deal, bring it. Aurora can scope the overlap, confirm the rollout path, and talk through prioritizing that onboarding inside the same control, evidence, and reviewer-sharing system your team already runs.

Exact framework and versionExpected review windowCurrent controls and evidence
What we work through
Version-specific feasibility

We look at the exact PIPEDA version or adjacent requirement set in scope so there is no ambiguity about what has to be supported.

Control and evidence overlap

We identify how much of the work can ride on the controls, approvals, and evidence your team already maintains in Aurora.

Onboarding priority and rollout path

If it is launch-critical, we will discuss what prioritization would look like with sales instead of leaving your team guessing.

Discuss Framework CoverageBrowse All Frameworks

Common questions

What Teams Ask Before the Next Review

How does this fit alongside the frameworks we already run?
Aurora maps each framework into the same governed control and evidence system, so teams expand coverage without rebuilding the entire record.
How quickly can we answer the next reviewer request?
Bring the framework version and review window you need to answer. Aurora helps your team move from mapped controls to traceable proof without rebuilding the package from scratch.
What does the reviewer actually receive?
Reviewers get structured access to the mapped record, linked evidence, approvals, and point-in-time exports instead of a loose collection of attachments.
Does Aurora replace the auditor or assessor?
No. Aurora keeps the work current, traceable, and ready to share. Auditors, assessors, and regulators remain independent.
Aurora does not guarantee certification, audit outcomes, or reviewer decisions.
Next step
Preparing for PIPEDA review?
Bring the version your reviewer asked for. We will show how Aurora maps PIPEDA into your existing control library, keeps evidence current, and gives reviewers a clean handoff.
Request a 15-Minute Walkthrough
Browse Integrations
15-minute walkthrough. No obligation. We'll map Aurora to your framework and show the exact outputs. (No compliance guarantees.)