Regulatory mapping

Stay ready for EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) reviews

Map EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) to the controls and evidence your team already maintains, keep the record current between cycles, and answer auditors, customers, and security reviewers with traceable proof without rebuilding the record each time.

Request a 15-minute walkthrough Browse the library

1,206

Requirements

Mapped controls

Evidence specs

Test assertions

Published by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act)Latest: Official Journal text published 2024-07-12; English base text current as of 2026-03-19; entered into force 2024-08-01; phased application under Article 113 (Chapters I-II from 2025-02-02, Chapter III Section 4 + Chapter V + Chapter VII + Chapter XII + Article 78 from 2025-08-02, general application from 2026-08-02, Article 6(1) corresponding obligations from 2027-08-02)Mapping updated Mar 24, 2026View official source

At a glance

What Teams Need to Know About EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689)

Best for

Teams responding to a named reviewer, customer, or regulatory request with version-specific proof.

Reviewers expect

Mapped requirements, linked evidence, approval history, and structured exports for EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) reviews.

Where teams stall

Rebuilding control mappings and chasing evidence for each EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) review cycle instead of reusing a current record.

Governed exports

Control matrix
Evidence package
Reviewer portal access
Audit-period exports

From request to handoff

How Teams Stay Review-Ready Between Cycles

Aurora turns one named framework request into a repeatable operating motion your team can maintain between audits, buyer reviews, and renewals.

Scope the exact version

Start with the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) version your reviewer or buyer already asked for so the record matches the request in front of you.

Reuse the controls you already trust

Map overlapping requirements to the same governed control library instead of rebuilding the program around one framework.

Keep proof current between cycles

Attach evidence with owners, freshness expectations, and reminders so the package stays current while the business keeps moving.

Capture approvals and decisions

Keep policy approvals, exceptions, and review history linked to the same record so reviewers see the operating context, not just files.

Hand off a clean reviewer package

Share structured access or export a scoped package with mappings, evidence context, and timestamps already intact.

See It with Your Framework Compare Plans

Supported versions

Mapped Versions of EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689)

Official Journal text published 2024-07-12; English base text current as of 2026-03-19; entered into force 2024-08-01; phased application under Article 113 (Chapters I-II from 2025-02-02, Chapter III Section 4 and Chapter V and Chapter VII and Chapter XII and Article 78 from 2025-08-02, general application from 2026-08-02, Article 6(1) corresponding obligations from 2027-08-02)

Source

1,206

Requirements

Mapped controls

Evidence specs

Tests

Coverage request

Need a Framework We Do Not List Yet?

If one customer, auditor, or regulator requirement is the only thing holding up the deal, bring it. Aurora can scope the overlap, confirm the rollout path, and talk through prioritizing that onboarding inside the same control, evidence, and governed-sharing system your team already runs.

Exact framework and versionExpected review windowCurrent controls and evidence

What we work through

Version-specific feasibility

We look at the exact EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) version or adjacent requirement set in scope so there is no ambiguity about what has to be supported.

Control and evidence overlap

We identify how much of the work can ride on the controls, approvals, and evidence your team already maintains in Aurora.

Onboarding priority and rollout path

If it is launch-critical, we will discuss what prioritization would look like with sales instead of leaving your team guessing.

Discuss Framework Coverage Browse All Frameworks

Common questions

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) Questions, Answered Plainly

How does this fit alongside the frameworks we already run?

Aurora maps each framework into the same governed control and evidence system, so teams expand coverage without rebuilding the entire record.

How quickly can we support the next review cycle?

Tell us about the framework version and review window you need to support. Aurora helps your team move from mapped controls to traceable proof without rebuilding the package from scratch.

What does the reviewer actually receive?

Reviewers get structured access to the mapped record, linked evidence, approvals, and point-in-time exports instead of a loose collection of attachments.

Does Aurora replace the auditor or assessor?

No. Aurora keeps the work current, traceable, and ready to share. Auditors, assessors, and regulators remain independent.

Aurora does not guarantee certification, audit outcomes, or reviewer decisions. It organizes, tracks, and shares the evidence and mappings your team maintains.

Live walkthrough

Preparing for EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) review?

Share the version your reviewer asked for. We will show how Aurora maps EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) into your existing control library, keeps evidence current, and gives reviewers a clean handoff.

Request a 15-minute walkthrough

Browse integrations

15-minute walkthrough. No obligation. We'll show Aurora applied to your workflow and show the exact outputs. (No compliance guarantees.)