Skip to content
Regulatory Mapping

Answer CPS 234 reviews with traceable proof

Link CPS 234 requirements to the controls and evidence you already manage, then answer APRA examiners, auditors, and enterprise buyers with traceable proof instead of weeks of manual assembly.

Publisher
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)
Primary version
2019-07
Coverage
1 jurisdiction
Mapping updated
Mar 16, 2026
Request a 15-Minute Walkthrough Browse Integrations
Why teams start here
Best fit
Programs that need state or regulator-specific proof mapped into the same control and evidence system they already maintain.
What stays visible
  • The exact review version stays in scope.
  • Owners, freshness, and approval state stay visible.
  • Reviewers get structured exports instead of loose files.
Requirements
36
Mapped controls
30
Evidence mappings
83
Automated checks
107
View official source

From request to handoff

How Teams Stay Review-Ready Between Cycles

Aurora turns one named framework request into a repeatable operating motion your team can maintain between audits, buyer reviews, and renewals.

01
Scope the exact version
Start with the APRA CPS 234 version your reviewer or buyer already asked for so the record matches the request in front of you.
02
Reuse the controls you already trust
Map overlapping requirements to the same governed control library instead of rebuilding the program around one framework.
03
Keep proof current between cycles
Attach evidence with owners, freshness expectations, and reminders so the package stays current while the business keeps moving.
04
Capture approvals and decisions
Keep policy approvals, exceptions, and review history linked to the same record so reviewers see the operating context, not just files.
05
Hand off a clean reviewer package
Share structured access or export a scoped package with mappings, evidence context, and timestamps already intact.

Governed proof

The Mapped Record Your Reviewer Opens

Show the exact framework version, the linked controls, and the supporting evidence in one clean view instead of sending reviewers into folders.

Aurora controls workspace showing in-scope framework mappings, linked evidence, and governed context.
Mapped Controls
What this framework covers

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 sets information security requirements for APRA-regulated entities, including governance, controls assurance, incident response, and APRA notification obligations.

Requirements
36
Mapped controls
30
Evidence specs
83
Versions supported
1
Governed outputs
  • Requirement-to-control mappings reviewers can trace line by line
  • Evidence records with owners, timestamps, and source context
  • Policy approvals and version history tied to the record
  • Point-in-time snapshots for the exact review window in front of you
Version-specific mappingsEvidence with owner + freshnessExportable reviewer package
See It with Your FrameworkCompare Plans

Versions

Supported Versions

Choose the published version your reviewer, customer, or auditor expects.

2019-07
View Source
Requirements
36
Mapped controls
30
Evidence mappings
83
Automated checks
107
Coverage request

Need a Framework We Do Not List Yet?

If one customer, auditor, or regulator requirement is the only thing holding up the deal, bring it. Aurora can scope the overlap, confirm the rollout path, and talk through prioritizing that onboarding inside the same control, evidence, and reviewer-sharing system your team already runs.

Exact framework and versionExpected review windowCurrent controls and evidence
What we work through
Version-specific feasibility

We look at the exact APRA CPS 234 version or adjacent requirement set in scope so there is no ambiguity about what has to be supported.

Control and evidence overlap

We identify how much of the work can ride on the controls, approvals, and evidence your team already maintains in Aurora.

Onboarding priority and rollout path

If it is launch-critical, we will discuss what prioritization would look like with sales instead of leaving your team guessing.

Discuss Framework CoverageBrowse All Frameworks

Common questions

What Teams Ask Before the Next Review

How does this support CPS 234 examinations and prudential reviews?
Aurora keeps mapped controls, evidence freshness, approvals, and response history visible, so your team can walk into APRA review windows with a current record instead of a last-minute rebuild.
Can we connect CPS 234 work to ISO 27001 or SOC 2 programs we already maintain?
Yes. Shared controls stay in one governed system, which lets teams reuse proof across CPS 234, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and other review motions instead of mapping everything twice.
How do reviewers see board-ready evidence and approval history?
Aurora packages mapped controls, linked evidence, approval trails, and point-in-time exports into a clean reviewer handoff through Trust Center or structured exports.
Does Aurora replace APRA or an external assessor?
No. Aurora prepares and maintains the record. Regulators, assessors, and auditors remain independent.
Aurora does not guarantee certification, audit outcomes, or reviewer decisions.
Next step
Be ready before the next CPS 234 examination
Bring the examiner request, audit window, or board-ready evidence gap already on your list. We will show how Aurora keeps the mapped record current and easy to defend.
Request a 15-Minute Walkthrough
Browse Integrations
15-minute walkthrough. No obligation. We'll map Aurora to your framework and show the exact outputs. (No compliance guarantees.)