Skip to content
Sample output
Assessment record
Verifiable proof reviewers can follow

What Buyers See First

Vendor Risk Workspace

A live Aurora view that supports Assigned Vendor Reviews with due diligence status, evidence, and follow-up actions.

Aurora vendor risk workspace showing due diligence status, evidence, and follow-up actions.
Due diligence status
Evidence requests

How It Works

How Teams Run Vendor Reviews Without Inbox Sprawl

See how Aurora tracks due diligence, follow-ups, and the reviewer-safe package each vendor review needs.

01
Intake the vendor and scope
Capture the right context at the start so the review is proportional to the actual risk.
02
Collect due diligence evidence
Keep questionnaires, documents, and supporting proof tied to the same vendor record.
03
Review answers and gaps
See what is missing, what is acceptable, and what needs follow-up without a side spreadsheet.
04
Track follow-up owners
Keep accountable next steps visible until the review is truly closed.
05
Share a reviewer-safe packet
Package the final record so internal stakeholders and auditors can follow the decision path quickly.

Verified Before Review

What This Adds To Vendor Reviews

The buyer fit, operating lift, and governed outputs this workflow adds to third-party review work.

Aurora vendor risk workspace showing due diligence status, evidence, and follow-up actions.

Designed for

Vendor reviews • SOC 2

What You Can Show Reviewers
Artifacts reviewers recognize, plus sample previews of structure.
Scroll for artifact previews
Plans
Plan availability
FoundationsContinuousSecurity OpsResilienceCommand
See plan availability.

Integrations

Connect The Systems Around Third Party Review

Bring procurement, ticketing, and evidence context into Aurora so vendor decisions stay attributable and current.

Common Questions

Questions Buyers Ask

Deployment scope, ownership, reviewer access, and how this capability fits the rest of your program.

How do policies, controls, and approvals stay tied together?
Aurora keeps version history, ownership, approvals, and related evidence attached so the governance record is easier to defend later.
What does the team actually share from this work?
Teams usually share Assessment record; Document request log; Review history. The goal is to give reviewers the right package without making them reconstruct how the program operates.
Where does this help most in recurring audits?
It fits best when the team is handling Vendor reviews, SOC 2 and needs the work to stay reusable instead of being rebuilt each cycle.
What changes after rollout?
Standardize vendor reviews Reduce manual follow-up
Next step
Bring The Framework, Control Set, Or Policy Review You Keep Rebuilding.
We’ll show how Aurora keeps approvals, change history, and evidence connected so the next review starts from current work.
Request a 15-Minute Walkthrough
Browse All Capabilities
Bring one live request and we will show the path to assessment record without losing approvals, ownership, or reviewer context.