Skip to content
Sample output
Controls catalog export
Answers with linked evidence

What Buyers See First

Controls And Coverage Workspace

A live Aurora view that supports Standards & Controls Library with mapped controls, evidence status, and review coverage.

Aurora controls workspace showing mapped controls, evidence status, and reviewer coverage.
Mapped controls
Coverage status

How It Works

How Teams Keep Controls Mapped And Review Ready

See how Aurora links control requirements, evidence, and owners without forcing the team to rebuild the story for every framework.

01
Map controls once
Create a control structure that can support overlapping frameworks and buyer asks.
02
Link evidence and ownership
Attach the proof, people, and operating context each control depends on.
03
Review status by framework
See which controls are ready, drifting, or waiting on action across the program.
04
Route gaps into follow-up work
Turn missing proof and weak controls into owned tasks instead of loose notes.
05
Share the control story clearly
Package control status and supporting proof so reviewers do not have to reconstruct it themselves.

Verified Before Review

What This Adds To Control Operations

The buyer fit, operational win, and governed outputs this workflow adds to control management.

Aurora controls workspace showing mapped controls, evidence status, and reviewer coverage.

Designed for

SOC 2 • CMMC

What You Can Show Reviewers
Artifacts reviewers recognize, plus sample previews of structure.
Scroll for artifact previews
Plans
Included in
FoundationsContinuousSecurity OpsResilienceCommand
See plan availability.

Integrations

Connect The Systems That Support Each Control

Bring evidence, ownership, and system context into Aurora so control coverage stays defensible between reviews.

Common Questions

Questions Buyers Ask

Deployment scope, ownership, reviewer access, and how this capability fits the rest of your program.

How do policies, controls, and approvals stay tied together?
Aurora keeps version history, ownership, approvals, and related evidence attached so the governance record is easier to defend later.
What does the team actually share from this work?
Teams usually share Controls catalog export; Mapping report. The goal is to give reviewers the right package without making them reconstruct how the program operates.
Where does this help most in recurring audits?
It fits best when the team is handling SOC 2, CMMC and needs the work to stay reusable instead of being rebuilt each cycle.
What changes after rollout?
Avoid redoing work per framework Keep ownership and scope explicit
Next step
Bring The Framework, Control Set, Or Policy Review You Keep Rebuilding.
We’ll show how Aurora keeps approvals, change history, and evidence connected so the next review starts from current work.
Request a 15-Minute Walkthrough
Browse All Capabilities
Bring one live request and we will show the path to controls catalog export without losing approvals, ownership, or reviewer context.