Feature
Policies Library: Start from templates or write your own, with built-in approvals and review schedules.
Start from templates or import your existing documents. Aurora manages drafts, reviews, approvals, and keeps revision history ready for auditors.
Start from templates or write your own, with built-in approvals and review schedules.
- Approvals stay attributable:Policy, control, and decision changes keep a visible owner and review trail.
- Controls map once:Reuse the same operating record across overlapping frameworks and reviewer asks.
- Evidence stays tied in:Governance decisions stay connected to the proof and timestamps behind them.
- Changes stay defensible:Keep the program current between audits instead of rebuilding the story from scratch.
Sample output
Policies with approvals
Verifiable proof reviewers can follow
Controls And Coverage Workspace

How Teams Keep Controls Mapped And Review Ready
01
Map controls once
Create a control structure that can support overlapping frameworks and buyer asks.
02
Link evidence and ownership
Attach the proof, people, and operating context each control depends on.
03
Review status by framework
See which controls are ready, drifting, or waiting on action across the program.
04
Route gaps into follow-up work
Turn missing proof and weak controls into owned tasks instead of loose notes.
05
Share the control story clearly
Package control status and supporting proof so reviewers do not have to reconstruct it themselves.
What This Adds To Control Operations

Designed for
SOC 2 • CMMC
Artifacts reviewers recognize, plus sample previews of structure.
Scroll for artifact previews
Connect The Systems That Support Each Control
Questions Teams Ask
How do policies, controls, and approvals stay tied together?
How do policies, controls, and approvals stay tied together?
Aurora keeps version history, ownership, approvals, and related evidence attached so the governance record is easier to defend later.
What does the team actually share from this work?
What does the team actually share from this work?
Teams usually share Policies with approvals (PDF); Approval logs; Revision history. The goal is to give reviewers the right package without making them reconstruct how the program operates.
Where does this help most in recurring audits?
Where does this help most in recurring audits?
It fits best when the team is handling SOC 2, CMMC and needs the work to stay reusable instead of being rebuilt each cycle.
What changes after rollout?
What changes after rollout?
Faster baseline governance Clear “who approved what” trails
Share The Framework, Control Set, Or Policy Review You Keep Rebuilding.
We’ll show how Aurora keeps approvals, change history, and evidence connected so the next review starts from current work.
Share one request and we will show the path to policies with approvals without losing approvals, ownership, or reviewer context.