Feature

Compliance Calendar

Track upcoming reviews, training cycles, vendor re-assessments, and audit milestones. Aurora helps turn governance into a repeatable rhythm.

Request a 15-Minute Walkthrough

Your program schedule, built in.

Approvals stay attributable:
Policy, control, and decision changes keep a visible owner and review trail.
Controls map once:
Reuse the same operating record across overlapping frameworks and reviewer asks.
Evidence stays tied in:
Governance decisions stay connected to the proof and timestamps behind them.
Changes stay defensible:
Keep the program current between audits instead of rebuilding the story from scratch.

Sample output

Calendar export

Answers with linked evidence

Browse All Guided Demos

What Buyers See First

Policy And Approval Workspace

A live Aurora view that supports Compliance Calendar with version history, approvals, and linked governance records.

Aurora policy workspace showing version history, approvals, and linked governance records.

Approvals

Version history

How It Works

How Teams Keep Policies Approved And Current

Follow the path from updates to approvals, publication, and review-ready governance records.

01

Start from the current policy set

Centralize the policy library so teams stop managing versions across folders and email threads.

02

Route changes to the right owners

Keep legal, security, and executive reviewers attached to the same approval path.

03

Approve and publish new versions

Preserve version history and sign-off records instead of relying on informal acknowledgments.

04

Map policies to frameworks

Reuse the same operating record across overlapping frameworks and buyer asks.

05

Export the current record on demand

Share the live version, approval history, and supporting context without scrambling for files.

Verified Before Review

What This Adds To Policy Operations

The buyer fit, operational discipline, and review-ready outputs this workflow adds to governance work.

Aurora policy workspace showing version history, approvals, and linked governance records.

Designed for

SOC 2 • CMMC • Vendor reviews

What You Can Show Reviewers

Artifacts reviewers recognize, plus sample previews of structure.

Scroll for artifact previews

Plans

Plan availability

FoundationsContinuousSecurity OpsResilienceCommand

See plan availability.

Integrations

Connect Policy Work To The Rest Of The Program

Tie frameworks, evidence, and approvals together so policy changes stay defensible when buyers or auditors ask questions.

Identity and access

Google Workspace (Directory)

Already supplying evidence, approvals, or operational context to this workflow.

Evidence, access, or operational context already in scope.

Identity and access

Already supplying evidence, approvals, or operational context to this workflow.

Code and source control

GitHub (Org Audit Log + Security Alerts)

Already supplying evidence, approvals, or operational context to this workflow.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Already supplying evidence, approvals, or operational context to this workflow.

Google Cloud Platform (GCP)

Already supplying evidence, approvals, or operational context to this workflow.

Microsoft Azure (ARM)

Already supplying evidence, approvals, or operational context to this workflow.

Already supplying evidence, approvals, or operational context to this workflow.

Evidence, access, or operational context already in scope.

Already supplying evidence, approvals, or operational context to this workflow.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Already supplying evidence, approvals, or operational context to this workflow.

Evidence, access, or operational context already in scope.

Browse every integration

See the full catalog, automation posture, and setup guides for the systems buyers ask about most.

Common Questions

Questions Buyers Ask

Deployment scope, ownership, reviewer access, and how this capability fits the rest of your program.

How do policies, controls, and approvals stay tied together?

Aurora keeps version history, ownership, approvals, and related evidence attached so the governance record is easier to defend later.

What does the team actually share from this work?

Teams usually share Calendar export; Completed cycle history. The goal is to give reviewers the right package without making them reconstruct how the program operates.

Where does this help most in recurring audits?

It fits best when the team is handling SOC 2, CMMC, Vendor reviews and needs the work to stay reusable instead of being rebuilt each cycle.

What changes after rollout?

Predictable program operations Better coordination across teams

Next step

Bring The Framework, Control Set, Or Policy Review You Keep Rebuilding.

We’ll show how Aurora keeps approvals, change history, and evidence connected so the next review starts from current work.

Request a 15-Minute Walkthrough

Browse All Capabilities

Bring one live request and we will show the path to calendar export without losing approvals, ownership, or reviewer context.